Showing posts with label spotify. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spotify. Show all posts

15 July 2011

Movie Review: “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2″


I can be redundant and tell you how many years Harry Potter has impacted the world (14 years), or how much money it has made through books, movies and other merchandise (Billions, with a capital B), or how many books there have been (seven), or how many movies there have been (eight), but I would just be repeating what most people have said in their openings (which I just did). Regardless, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 is a fitting end to a lengthy series and after the dramatic set up in the first half Part 2 ends with one emotional bang.




Before I get into this review I have to be honest with you and say that I have never read the books. I did watch the movies however, and found them to be an excellent form of magic, mystery, and intrigue. So while it doesn’t pain me to see this franchise come to an end, I can certainly respect the people who have cherished this franchise shed a tear or two watching their beloved franchise turn its last page.

Now if you haven’t seen the first half, I suggest you do so now, otherwise you will not understand the quest or reasoning behind it. Yes, I am giving you homework.

For those who think that WB is just splitting the films into two parts to milk it for what its worth, you need to understand that if the film was shot as a singular entity it would have been difficult to tell the story and it also would have been a disservice to the fans. Those who have been following the franchise who haven’t been reading the books or haven’t watched Part 1 will be confused with some of the relationships that seemingly pop up out of no where, who has survived and who hasn’t, or how Harry and the gang came across Godric Gryffindor’s Sword. That being said, let’s start with this review.



The second half literally starts where it left off with the final scene in the first half. Our hero and his band of merry friends have been forced to run. Dobby has died. Hogwarts is being controlled with an iron fist, and everyone’s most hated snake looking wizard has just acquired the most powerful wand ever created. Now its up to our heroes to save the world and wizardry. Can it be done? According to some, no it can’t. But Harry be damned if he didn’t try.

From there that emotional build up that we saw in the first film is gone and is turned into a full on action movie. Again, if this had been shot as one film, it would not have made as much as an impact for the audience. All the teenage angst is out of the way. Unfortunately the action scenes either move too fast or takes too long get through that it can get confusing at times. But the set pieces in all these action scenes give new meaning to devastation and destruction, as the world of Hogwarts crumble before the students’ eyes. But as visually stunning as these action scenes are, the performances and the quieter moments that happen during the action scenes that are the best.



Watching Ralph Fiennes become the sinister Voldermort is exciting. With every wand wave and slithering vocals, you can tell than Mr. Fiennes has been waiting for this moment and will milk it for what its worth. And I can tell you one thing, every scene he is in is truly frightening, and that’s a good thing. The relationships that are finally established can give out a cheer and a laugh. These long-awaited relationships that have been building up to its dramatic end also mark how long this film has come along.

The lack of color also makes for a whimsy apocalyptic end to the school. Its gray stone color like scheme also adds to the emotional scenes, giving it a cold feeling of dread.



I cannot tell what stays true and what has been modified, but based on the screening reaction, fans will be happy. Despite what Yates may have kept and may have left out, the one question that is on everyone’s mind is why choose to do post-conversion 3D, especially when post-conversion 3D has been widely panned. Sure the effect may be unnecessary and may not work at times, but when it works, it works.

Rarely does a franchise as large as the Harry Potter series stay fluid. From the start we watch the three leads Daniel Radcliff, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint grow up to be strong actors, and it shows in the franchise finale. It must not have been an easy task, but the cast has been able to stay true to the character without skipping a beat. But it is not only our leads that carry the film, but also the supporting cast that help bare the burden of making the franchise what it is today.



As the film comes to a close, we see (this really shouldn’t be a spoiler) how much our beloved characters have gone through, and after eight films that have spanned a decade, the audience is rewarded with a somewhat quick and seemingly unsatisfying ending. But despite its quick action scenes and ending, I feel as though the emotional build up, the performances, and the relationships that are formed redeem all those minor flaws.

As an audience member who has only seen the world of Harry Potter on the big screen as opposed to the text, I found that the movie did tie up all the necessary loose ends. To say that Part 2 is the best of the franchise would be an understatement, because there are no words to describe how spectacular this film really is. Sure there are flaws in it, but every Harry Potter entry had its flaws.

I may not have understood the Hogwarts lingo, but what makes the entire Harry Potter franchise so special that it was about the character struggles, the underdog stories, the romance, the friendships, and the boy who becomes a man.

Clemens Mistrial Declared After U.S. Shows Barred Evidence

The perjury trial of former Major League Baseball pitcher Roger Clemens ended in a mistrial on the second day of witness testimony after prosecutors showed the jury evidence that violated a court order.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington said today that he's considering barring further prosecution of Clemens on double-jeopardy grounds and set a hearing for Sept. 2 on whether to let the case proceed.
Clemens, 48, a seven-time Cy Young Award winner, is accused of lying to Congress about his use of steroids and human growth hormone. Prosecutors said that Andy Pettitte, a former teammate, would testify about his close relationship with Clemens and how Clemens told him in 1999 or 2000 that he had used HGH. Clemens told Congress that Pettitte misheard the conversation.

Walton said that prosecutors violated a court order today when they showed the jury of 10 women and two men a video clip of the 2008 hearing where Pettitte's wife was discussed. Walton ruled earlier that any reference to an affidavit given to Congress by Laura Pettitte couldn't be admitted into evidence in the government's presentation of its main case.

"Mr. Pettitte's testimony is critical as to whether this man goes to prison," Walton said, noting that the video improperly bolstered Pettitte's credibility with the jury. "I don't see how to unring the bell."
'Better Not'

Clemens's defense attorney, Rusty Hardin, when asked to comment after today's proceeding, said, "I'd love to, but I better not."

Bill Miller, the spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, said in a statement that Walton's order barring anyone involved in the case from discussing it precluded comment.

Clemens's mistrial is the second federal perjury trial of a former Major League Baseball player in three months to end inconclusively. Barry Bonds, the home-run record holder, was convicted in federal court in San Francisco in April of obstructing justice for statements he made to a grand jury in 2003 when asked whether his trainer ever gave him anything that required a syringe injection.

Jurors in the Bonds trial couldn't agree on whether he lied in saying he didn't knowingly take steroids and take human growth hormone or receive injections by his trainer. A mistrial was declared on those counts.
The U.S. has yet to say whether he will be retried.

Thirty Years

Clemens was charged with one count of obstructing a congressional investigation, three counts of making false statements and two counts of perjury in connection with a congressional probe of ballplayers use of performance-enhancing drugs. If convicted on all charges, he faces as long as 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine.

The charges stem from statements Clemens made to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in February 2008, in an interview with committee staff and later at a public hearing. Clemens, under oath, denied ever using anabolic steroids or human growth hormone, according to the indictment.

During the public hearing on Feb. 13, Clemens testified while a few feet away from the government's main witness in the trial, his former trainer Brian McNamee, who said he injected Clemens with both drugs while Clemens pitched for the Toronto Blue Jays and the New York Yankees.

Opening Statement Stopped

Walton stopped Durham during his opening statement as the prosecutor told jurors that Clemens's former Yankee teammates Pettitte, Chuck Knoblauch and Mike Stanton would be called to testify how they used HGH. Walton ordered jurors to disregard the reference to the other players, which violated a pre-trial order.
Walton also ruled July 6 that the government was barred from using or referring to any part of an affidavit by Pettitte's wife, Laura, who swore her husband had told her about a conversation with Clemens in which Clemens acknowledged using the drugs.

Laura Pettitte could only be brought up in the trial to rebut information from the defense, Walton ruled.
The trial was stopped as Durham took testimony from the government's third witness, Phil Barnett, the House staffer who deposed Clemens.

Durham played a clip of Representative Elijah Cummings questioning Clemens during the Feb. 13, 2008 hearing. As the video played, a transcript of what was being said was highlighted on the lower portion of the screen.

Pettitte's Wife

Cummings mentioned an affidavit the committee received from Pettitte's wife.

Walton stopped the trial and ordered the lawyers to the bench. After a few minutes, he sent the jurors out of the courtroom.

"I clearly ruled that Mr. Pettitte's wife and what Mr. Pettitte said to his wife could not come in," Walton said. "This clearly runs afoul of my pretrial rulings."

Walton said that he was "perplexed" that the government's exhibits hadn't been altered after his ruling.

"A first-year law student knows you can't bolster the credibility of one witness with clearly inadmissible evidence from another witness," Walton said.

A half hour later he declared the mistrial.

Normally, a criminal defendant can't be tried twice for the same crime. Exceptions include when a jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, said Stanford University criminal law professor Robert Weisberg.

'Procedural Goof-Up'

"A procedural goof-up shouldn't preclude a retrial, unless the judge believes it involves intentional, egregious misconduct by the prosecutor," said Weisberg, citing a Supreme Court ruling.

A mistrial so early in a case is "almost unheard of," Weisberg said.

The government's last high-profile loss in a Washington courtroom was the case against the now-deceased Alaska Republican Senator Ted Stevens. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan threw out Stevens' 2008 conviction for corruption the following year because federal prosecutors withheld evidence from the defense. Sullivan ordered an investigation into whether the government's "shocking" conduct was criminal.

During the course of a Justice Department probe of the matter, one of the prosecutors, Nicholas Marsh, killed himself. Unlike the Clemens case, Stevens prosecution was handled by the Justice Department's public corruption unit, not by the U.S. Attorney's office in Washington.

The case is U.S. v. Clemens, 10-cr-00223, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).

--With assistance from Greg Farrell in New York. Editors: Fred Strasser, Andrew Dunn